You are currently browsing the category archive for the 'Evangelism' category.
I’m reading through a book called “Total Church” right now. It’s by Tim Chester and Steve Timmis, British co-founders of a church-planting initiative called The Crowded House. It’s been delightful.
In short, the authors call us to structure our ideas of how to “do church” around two realities: gospel and community. I find the implications of this for evangelism to be life-giving. Rather than advocating door-to-door evangelism or street preaching (which certainly have their place but tend to be a-relational), Chester and Timmis envision a three-strand model of evangelism involving building relationships, sharing the gospel, and introducing people to community. This is based in part on Jesus’ words to the disciples in John 13:35 — “By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
Here’s what this looks like practically. This makes me excited:
So often the call to evangelism produces guilt and despondency. This is due in part to ungodly attitudes such as pride and the fear of man. Paul is clear in 1 Corinthians that we have a “foolish” message to proclaim in a foolish manner (1:18-2:5). So evangelism often makes us look foolish, and few people relish that prospect.
However, not all of us are eloquent or engaging. Not everyone can think on their feet. Some people are simply not good at speaking to strangers and forming new friendships. One of the practical benefits of the three-strand model of evangelism is that it gives a role to all of God’s people. By making evangelism a community project, it also takes seriously the sovereign work of the Holy Spirit in distributing a variety of gifts among his people. Everyone has a part to play — the new Christian, the introvert, the extrovert, the eloquent, the stuttering, the intelligent, the awkward. I may be the one who has begun to build a relationship with my neighbor, but in introducing him to community, it is someone else who shares the gospel with him. That is not only legitimate — it is positively thrilling! Pete may never share the gospel verbally with Duncan, but his welcome and love are an integral part of the evangelistic process and should be honored as such. Meanwhile Susan can make friends and introduce them to the community, confident that others will present them — at an appropriate point in an appropriate way — with the challenges of the gospel. It is lovely to think of us making up for one another’s deficiencies with our collective community strengths.
If evangelism is a community project, our different gifts and personalities can complement one another. Some people are good at building relationships with new people. Some are socialites — the one who will organize a trip or an activity. Some people are great at hospitality. Some are good at initiating gospel conversations. Some are good at confronting heart issues. In each case I can think of individuals in our small congregation who fit the bill. I am not good at any of these things. I was the one who did evangelistic Bible studies with Al. At the end I said, “You ought to be baptized,” and he said, “Okay.” Simple as that! But I would never have got that far if I had not been part of a team. (Pages 62-63)
I had the opportunity to speak with a Muslim and a Jehovah’s Witness this past week. Though there are sweeping differences between the two religious frameworks, there is one striking bond.
Both reject Jesus.
The tricky part, though, is that neither would say they do. For the Muslim, Jesus is a prophet who is to be honored. For the Jehovah’s Witness, Jesus is the Son of God who offered his life to make atonement for sin.
However, both balk at the idea of Jesus being God. Therefore, both reject Jesus.
The Muslim arrives at this conclusion by disregarding the Biblical witness to Jesus’ divinity. The Jehovah’s Witness arrives at this conclusion by distorting the Biblical witness.
The response to both approaches is the same: show them Jesus.
Point them to texts like John 8:58 — “Jesus said to them, ‘Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.’”
Or John 10:31-33 — “The Jews picked up stones again to stone him. Jesus answered them, ‘I have shown you many good works from the Father; for which of them are you going to stone me?’ The Jews answered him, ‘It is not for a good work that we are going to stone you but for blasphemy, because you, being a man, make yourself God.’”
Or John 20:27-28 — “Then he said to Thomas, ‘Put your finger here, and see my hands; and put out your hand, and place it in my side. Do not disbelieve, but believe.’ Thomas answered him, ‘My Lord and my God!’”
Show them Jesus, correct them gently, and then trust that “God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth, and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will” (2 Timothy 2:25-26).
To usher in the month of July I’m giving away a free copy of “The Gospel and Personal Evangelism” by Mark Dever, senior pastor of Capitol Hill Baptist Church in Washington, D.C., and executive director of 9Marks.
Here’s the shake-down. Between now and midnight tomorrow (Wednesday, July 2 Central Standard Time), send an e-mail to thefoolsgoldblog@gmail.com. In the e-mail, include your name, the name and address of your blog (if you have one), what you do during the day, and any interesting event that has happened to you this summer. It could be somewhere you’ve visited, someone you’ve talked to, a book you’ve read, a strange talent you’ve mastered, etc. I will then randomly select an entry, and e-mail the winner to ask for his or her mailing address. The winner will be announced sometime on Thursday, July 3.
“The Gospel and Personal Evangelism” is a quick read, and provides a very sound treatment of various issues surrounding evangelism. Dever’s approach is to structure his book around seven questions:
- Why Don’t We Evangelize?
- What Is the Gospel?
- Who Should Evangelize?
- How Should We Evangelize?
- What Isn’t Evangelism?
- What Should We Do After We Evangelize?
- Why Should We Evangelize?
One of the reasons I love the book is that not only is Dever an evangelist, but he operates out of a deep embrace of the sovereignty of God. Here is a good quote from the book:
Somehow, Paul found the doctrine of God’s sovereignty an encouragement in his evangelism. Do we need to recover this confidence in a day of increasing opposition to the public preaching of the gospel? I think that we do. I fear that much of today’s evangelism will soon end. As evangelism becomes more and more unpopular, I fear that some Christians will simply dilute it, water it down, alter it, or even stop sharing the good news altogether. I think a better understanding of the Bible’s teaching on God’s election would help them. I think it would give them confidence and joy in their evangelism. (pg. 105)
So, shoot me an e-mail and we will see who wins this month’s giveaway!
In his book “The Gospel and Personal Evangelism,” Mark Dever advocates holding together three qualities in sharing the gospel: honesty, urgency, and joy. If you leave any one of these out, you will end up promoting either a deficient message or a deficient attitude. Here is what he writes:
“…there is a certain balance that we want to strive for in our evangelism, a balance of honesty and urgency and joy. Too often we have only one, or at best, two, of these aspects rather than all three. The balance is important. These three together most appropriately represent the gospel” (pg. 55).
He adds later, “Honesty and urgency with no joy gives us a grim determination (read Philippians). Honesty and joy with no urgency gives us a carelessness about time (read 2 Peter). And urgency and joy with no honesty leads us into distorted claims about immediate benefits of the gospel (read 1 Peter)” (pg. 60).
May God make us a straight-shooting, clock-watching, winsome people.



